Case Study · Google Domains · Q3 2019 — Q2 2020
Domains Reports provides the tool to understand what keywords drive the most traffic to their website and how they can optimize their online presence along with their business growth from other Google products like Search Console.
01 — Overview
CUJ
The problem. There's a desire by SMBs to leverage analytics, but they are intimidated for the following reasons:
Empower users to gain insights into their website's traffic originating from Google Search. This feature enables users to analyze data, understand the driving factors behind traffic, and optimize content accordingly.
I led the UX and UI design for this project, collaborating extensively with cross-functional partners including Product Management, Engineering, Marketing, User Experience Research (UXR), User Experience Writing (UXW), gTech, and cross-Product Area (PA) teams like Search Console and Google Analytics.
02 — Design process
A four-phase process took Reports from open questions to a validated, launched design.
8 qualitative interviews with SMBs to understand user journeys after successful setup of a website. Identified valuable attached services and pain points hindering service adoption.
Led a cross-functional brainstorming session to translate research findings into project objectives. Explored and defined the ideal vision for attached services, ensuring alignment across teams.
Conducted 8 qualitative sessions to explore Reports integration and reviewed 13 design variants across 4 concepts. Conducted terminology testing on four potential labels for the Analytics section in Domains.
Prioritized Reports features and data based on concept study feedback. Collaborated with engineers, PMs, and cross-functional PAs to define project scope. Developed high-fidelity designs incorporating user insights.
03 — Foundational research
Interviews with 8 SMBs to understand user journeys after successful setup of a website.
Google Domains' user base has a mix of 'Web professionals' (e.g. agencies, developers, advanced users) and 'SMBs' (e.g. very small businesses, side hustlers, etc.). Our primary audience for this integration is mainly SMBs, but we segregated them based on the usage and awareness of attached services (analytics and Ads) and focused on the SMB users who:
The high-level questions we addressed were:
Users understood at a high level the value propositions from Search Console and found it relevant to their use cases (informing keyword content, identifying page errors).
Users had difficulty setting up Search Console if it wasn't already on their site. Once inside, they struggled with the terminology and found it hard to turn data into insights.
SMBs in particular perceive these areas as requiring digital marketing expertise. Reduce their load by summarizing key insights and relating them back to actions they have completed.
Users were open to a push-based model for surfacing analytic insights — valuable for providing a high-level summary and highlighting insights users might have missed.
04 — Brainstorming session
I facilitated a half-day brainstorming session with 12 cross-functional team members (3 PM, 3 Eng, 1 Marketing, 1 Business Development, 4 UXers). We discussed our ideal vision for Reports, produced ideas and sketches, and explored directions in order to inform the future concept design study.
We analyzed Search Console features and how users utilize the information. Since Search Console's primary use cases and target audience differ from Domains' target audience, we brainstormed what value we could provide to our users in addition to Search Console and what features would be most useful to them. The resulting concepts prioritized:
A consolidated view of key metrics from DNS, analytics, and Search Console.
Offer educational content to help users understand and utilize analytics effectively.
Send email notifications to alert users about new analytics features or relevant updates.
05 — User studies
Building upon our brainstorming and foundational research insights, I collaborated with UXR to conduct a concept study. We facilitated eight 60-minute one-on-one sessions to explore four distinct concepts for integrating analytics into the user experience. Our goals were to:
"As a small business owner, I want to build a website with analytics automatically provided for me so that I can leverage its insights without having to fuss around with setting it up."
"As a small business owner, I want to define how customers get to my site, what queries are being entered, and which page they visited so I can use insights for my digital marketing — reaching the right people at the right time to bring in more customers."
"I want to see summarized monthly insights of how my website is doing, identification of trends, and recommendations for improvements — and learn how I can improve its discovery on Google Search."




During the concept study, we used "Data Reports" to label the Search Console report within Google Domains. However, this term caused uncertainty among users regarding its connection to database queries. To address this, I collaborated with UXR, UX Writing, and PM to assess four alternative terms for the analytics section. We recruited a sample of 2,000 MTurk workers previously screened for domain experience, and a total of 398 surveys were completed (approximately 100 for each terminology variant). We then assessed the clarity, complexity, appropriateness, and discoverability of each label within our navigation menu.
The terms we tested were: Metrics · Reports · Data Summary · Web Traffic.
All tested labels allowed users to correctly navigate to the analytics section. However, "Reports" was the most effective label, enabling quicker user navigation without sacrificing accuracy.
While "Web Traffic" rated highly in clarity and relevance, "Reports" offers a balance of speed and accuracy, potentially accommodating future expansion beyond web-specific data.
06 — Scope feasibility
Based on the insights from the concept study, UX created lists of features critical to users, and I collaborated with PM and Eng to scope the top-priority feature for our v1 version.
07 — Final design
I distilled the research into three design principles, then delivered a final design that makes traffic insight simple to set up, understand, and act on.
Simplify the setup and adoption of analytics tools by integrating them directly into the Domains/website hub, minimizing additional effort for users.
Introduce Reports at the appropriate stage of the web development lifecycle to maximize the efficiency of online presence improvement while providing bite-sized learning opportunities for users new to analytics tools.
Deliver clear, actionable insights and best-practice recommendations to help users quickly understand their website's performance, identify trends, and make improvements.



08 — Impact
The launch of Reports in Q2 2020 yielded immediate results:
09 — Post-launch
In February 2021, as a follow-up to the Reports launch, I collaborated with UXR to conduct a user insight study to see how it had landed after 9 months. The research addressed the following high-level questions:
Walked through the existing user journey against usability principles to identify potential pain points.
Sampled 30k sessions of reports-page action logs to surface behavior patterns and drop-off points.
A HaTS survey on the reports page capturing reasons for setup, visit frequency, and positives/negatives.
Based on the insights, I created the deck for short-term and long-term recommendations, and we launched v1.5 with the short-term recommendations incorporated in Q4 2021.